McDowell, John, 1942-

Enlarge text Shrink text
  • Personality
| מספר מערכת 987007265120905171
Information for Authority record
Name (Hebrew)
מקדואל, ג'ון, 1942-
Name (Latin)
McDowell, John, 1942-
Other forms of name
McDowell, John Henry nnea
Date of birth
1942-03-07
Field of activity
Philosophy
Occupation
Philosophers
Associated Language
eng
Gender
male
Fuller form of name
John Henry
MARC
MARC
Other Identifiers
VIAF: 108362189
Wikidata: Q1252398
Library of congress: n 82072836
Sources of Information
  • Plato. Theaetetus, 1973:t.p. (John McDowell)
  • Meaning, knowledge, and reality, 1998:t.p. (John McDowell)
  • BL AL recd. 25 Oct. 1988(John Henry McDowell, born 7 Mar. 1942)
  • אודותיו בספר: ג'ון מקדואל - הנפש כמרחב רציונאלי הפתוח לעולם. 2006.
1 / 2
Wikipedia description:

John Henry McDowell (born 7 March 1942) is a South African philosopher, formerly a fellow of University College, Oxford, and now university professor at the University of Pittsburgh. Although he has written on metaphysics, epistemology, ancient philosophy, nature, and meta-ethics, McDowell's most influential work has been in the philosophy of mind and philosophy of language. McDowell was one of three recipients of the 2010 Andrew W. Mellon Foundation's Distinguished Achievement Award, and is a Fellow of both the American Academy of Arts & Sciences and the British Academy. McDowell has, throughout his career, understood philosophy to be "therapeutic" and thereby to "leave everything as it is" (Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations), which he understands to be a form of philosophical quietism (although he does not consider himself to be a "quietist"). The philosophical quietist believes that philosophy cannot make any explanatory comment about how, for example, thought and talk relate to the world but can, by offering re-descriptions of philosophically problematic cases, return the confused philosopher to a state of intellectual perspicacity. However, in defending this quietistic perspective McDowell has engaged with the work of leading contemporaries in such a way as to therapeutically dissolve what he takes to be philosophical error, while defending major positions and interpretations from major figures in philosophical history, and developing original and distinctive theses about language, mind and value. In each case, he has tried to resist the influence of what he regards as a scientistic, reductive form of philosophical naturalism that has become very commonplace in our historical moment, while nevertheless defending a form of "Aristotelian naturalism," bolstered by key insights from Hegel, Wittgenstein, and others.

Read more on Wikipedia >