Africa, Southern History Mfecane period, 1816-ca. 1840

Enlarge text Shrink text
  • Topic
| מספר מערכת 987007534338205171
Information for Authority record
Name (Hebrew)
אפריקה הדרומית היסטוריה תקופת מפקנה, 1836-1840 בערך
Name (Latin)
Africa, Southern History Mfecane period, 1816-ca. 1840
Other forms of name
Difaqane period, 1816-ca. 1840
Lifaqane period, 1816-ca. 1840
Mfecane period, 1816-ca. 1840
MARC
MARC
Other Identifiers
Wikidata: Q865081
Library of congress: sh 88001790
Sources of Information
  • Britannica Micro.(mfecane, difaqane)
  • Britannica Macro.:v. 17, pp. 281-282.
  • Historical atlas of Africa, 1985:p. 50 (mfecane)
  • Bardill, J.E. Lesotho, 1985:pp. 8-9, 10, 12, 217 (lifaqane)
  • Oxford history of South Africa, 1969:v. 1, p. 479 of index (difaqane)
  • Tlou, T. History of Botswana, 1984:p. 274 of index (difaqane)
1 / 1
Wikipedia description:

The Mfecane, also known by the Sesotho names Difaqane or Lifaqane (all meaning "crushing," "scattering," "forced dispersal," or "forced migration"), was a historical period of heightened military conflict and migration associated with state formation and expansion in Southern Africa. The exact range of dates that comprise the Mfecane varies between sources. At its broadest, the period lasted from the late eighteenth century to the mid-nineteenth century, but scholars often focus on an intensive period from the 1810s to the 1840s. Traditional estimates for the death toll range from 1 million to 2 million; however, these numbers are controversial, and some recent scholars revise the mortality figure significantly downwards and attribute the root causes to complex political, economic, and environmental developments. The Mfecane is significant in that it saw the formation of new states, institutions, and ethnic identities in southeastern Africa. The Mfecane's historiography itself is also historically significant, with different versions having been employed to serve a range of political purposes since its inception as a historical concept. The label first emerged in the 1830s and blamed the disruption on the actions of King Shaka, who was alleged to have waged near-genocidal wars that depopulated the land and sparked a chain reaction of violence as fleeing groups sought to conquer new lands. Since the latter half of the 20th century, this interpretation has fallen out of favour among scholars due to a lack of historical evidence.

Read more on Wikipedia >